California Equal Pay Act / Pay Discrimination

California law requires equal pay for substantially similar work, regardless of sex, race, or ethnicity.

Trusted Counsel
Client Advocacy
Workplace Justice
Proven Results
woman-holding-a-tablet-while-standing-in-an-office

California requires equal pay for substantially similar work. Under Labor Code section 1197.5, an employer may not pay an employee less than employees of a different sex, race, or ethnicity for work that is substantially similar when viewed as a composite of skill, effort, and responsibility, and performed under similar working conditions.

What Substantially Similar Work Means

The comparison is about job content rather than job titles. Two employees can hold different titles, report to different managers, sit in different departments, or work at different locations and still serve as proper comparators. California law does not include the same worksite limitation that applies under the federal Equal Pay Act.

Skill refers to experience, training, education, and ability. Effort refers to physical or mental exertion. Responsibility refers to accountability and the scope of duties assigned. An employee does not have to prove that the employer intended to discriminate. Establishing the disparity for substantially similar work shifts the burden to the employer to justify it.

Case Results

$120,000
Wage Dispute
$300,000
Safety Violation / Retaliation
$400,000
Wrongful Termination
$350,000
Discrimination
$75,000
Break Violations
$500,000
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Past case results are not a guarantee of future performance. Outcomes vary according to the unique facts of each case.

The Employer's Defenses

An employer must account for the entire difference in pay using one or more of the factors the statute allows:

A seniority system
A merit system
A system that measures earnings
by quantity or quality of production
A bona fide factor other than sex,
race, or ethnicity, such as education,
training, or experience

The fourth factor must be job related and consistent with business necessity, and it fails if the employee shows that an alternative practice would serve the same purpose without producing the disparity. Prior salary cannot justify a pay difference, and employers may not ask applicants about salary history.

two-piggy-banks-balanced-unevenly-on-a-wooden-plank

What Sets Us Apart

Decades of Experience

Proven Results

Focused on You

hand-holding-a-sign-reading-equal-work-equal-pay-against-a-yellow-background

What Changed in 2026

Effective January 1, 2026, Senate Bill 642 broadened the definitions of wages and wage rates for Equal Pay Act purposes to include equity awards, stock and stock options, bonuses, profit sharing, and certain benefits. Pay comparisons now have to account for total compensation rather than base salary alone, which matters most in industries where equity makes up a significant share of what people earn. The same legislation refined the pay scale disclosure requirement so that employers with 15 or more employees must post a good faith estimate of the compensation they actually expect to pay at hire.

Pay Transparency Rules That Support a Claim

These disclosures often provide the first concrete evidence a worker has that a disparity exists. A posting for the position an employee already holds, listing a range above what that employee is paid, is a common starting point for a claim.

Deadlines and Recovery

An Equal Pay Act claim must be brought within two years of the violation, or three years if the violation was willful. Each paycheck reflecting the disparity can count as a separate violation, which affects how far back the claim reaches.

An employee may recover the amount of the underpayment, interest, and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, along with attorneys’ fees and costs. Relief can cover the entire period during which the violation existed, up to six years.

Claims may be filed with the Labor Commissioner’s Office or brought directly in court. Where the pay disparity also reflects discrimination based on a protected characteristic, a parallel claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act may be filed with the California Civil Rights Department within three years of the last unlawful act.

Get in Touch
Speak with a confidential and compassionate attorney today.

    Submitting this form does not create an attorney–client relationship. Do not include confidential or case-specific information. Tracking technologies remain disabled until you consent.